Protocol Online logo
Top : Forum Archives: : SDS-PAGE and Western Blotting

transfer of high molecular weight proteins - (Nov/14/2008 )

Pages: 1 2 Next

Hi
I am trying to probe for a high molecular weight complex but am not getting consistent detection. I use gradient gels and PVDF membrane for probing my 350kDa complex. Many times the background is immense though the bands are also present. Any suggestions please??

-sandiego-

QUOTE (sandiego @ Nov 14 2008, 06:23 PM)
Hi
I am trying to probe for a high molecular weight complex but am not getting consistent detection. I use gradient gels and PVDF membrane for probing my 350kDa complex. Many times the background is immense though the bands are also present. Any suggestions please??


Make sure that it is running into gel and not stuck in the well.
-Gradient is good.
-Run for a longer time.
-Boil or not boil depending upon whatever works.

Make sure of complete transfer.
-PVDF is good.
-confirm by Staining the gel. PonceauS for membrane.
-Use thinner gel.
-Longer transfer time.
-May think of adding extra SDS to transfer buffer.
-Increased Methanol in transfer buffer may also help.

If transfer is complete, the background problem is a as good as any westerns.
-Refer to discussions on how to reduce background.

-cellcounter-

Blot cool (4 degrees C) and long (overnight -24 hours). It is best if you try several different times to see what works best for you.

-bob1-

Hi,

I am working with a high molecular weight protein (MW 512kDa). For protein detection, I tried 5% SDS PAGE gel but the protein got stuck at the interface between the stacking and the running gel. I am using 1% SDS (TGS based) for running gel and 1% SDS and 20% methanol in the transfer buffer. If any one has experience working with such a high molecular weight proteins, please give me suggestions.

-joyce-22-

QUOTE ("joyce-22)
I tried 5% SDS PAGE gel but the protein got stuck at the interface between the stacking and the running gel

Seems kind of obvious but you don't have to use a stacker. They aren't absolutely necessary, especially for high MW proteins, though they do make small proteins run more evenly. I would also have said that 5% was a bit high for a 500 kDa protein, you may need to switch to some other gel system.

I would also lower the methanol concentration in your transfer, it reduces the mobility during transfer.

-bob1-

reduce the sds in your transfer buffer. more than 0.05% will interfere with binding.

the 20% methanol will help strip sds from the protein to aid binding, you can leave it alone if you want (you can extend transfer time, if necessary).

we used to run a 3.5-5% gradient gel for high mw proteins (with a 8M-0 urea gradient, to sharpen the bands).

-mdfenko-

Oh great, many huge protein fans here. I also need your help biggrin.gif

I try to detect a 310 kDa protein. Up till now I used 6% resolving gel, 5% stacking gel and a Tris-glycine buffer system.
I stained the gel and it seems that there are proteins > 250 kDa on my gel (that's the largest protein of my marker). I didn't stain the PVDF membrane after transfer as I read this might interfere with detection afterwards (right? wrong?), but I will do it next time. I had problems with blocking and I got a very nice secondary antibody binding up to 250 kDa, but not beyond. So I think my main problem is the transfer.

You mentioned not using stacking gels - does this also apply if I can't use gradient gels? Would you suggest 5% or 6% gels? Or even less?

For the transfer I used a semi-dry blotting unit, but as I read that this might be suboptimal, I ordered a tank blot unit. Do you have any suggestions for a good transfer buffer? Is SDS necessary in the transfer buffer? Mine has just methanol, but no SDS.

And one question for blocking: We usually use 5% BSA in TBS-T. In the data sheet of my primary antibody they suggest 5% milk powder in TBS-T. How do I sterilze this solution? I was told not to autoclave it, but filtration was...a bit....ineffective wink.gif


Thanks a lot smile.gif
Vista

-vista-

QUOTE (vista @ Dec 19 2008, 03:49 AM)
Oh great, many huge protein fans here. I also need your help biggrin.gif

I try to detect a 310 kDa protein. Up till now I used 6% resolving gel, 5% stacking gel and a Tris-glycine buffer system.
I stained the gel and it seems that there are proteins > 250 kDa on my gel (that's the largest protein of my marker). I didn't stain the PVDF membrane after transfer as I read this might interfere with detection afterwards (right? wrong?), but I will do it next time. I had problems with blocking and I got a very nice secondary antibody binding up to 250 kDa, but not beyond. So I think my main problem is the transfer.

You mentioned not using stacking gels - does this also apply if I can't use gradient gels? Would you suggest 5% or 6% gels? Or even less?

For the transfer I used a semi-dry blotting unit, but as I read that this might be suboptimal, I ordered a tank blot unit. Do you have any suggestions for a good transfer buffer? Is SDS necessary in the transfer buffer? Mine has just methanol, but no SDS.

And one question for blocking: We usually use 5% BSA in TBS-T. In the data sheet of my primary antibody they suggest 5% milk powder in TBS-T. How do I sterilze this solution? I was told not to autoclave it, but filtration was...a bit....ineffective wink.gif


Thanks a lot smile.gif
Vista


if you start with 5-6% in separating gel you do not need a stacking gel; if used it should be lower than <5%;

you need a reference protein >/= 310 kDa;

use 0.037-0.05%SDS

why using sterile milk solution? through it away after usage...

-The Bearer-

QUOTE (The Bearer @ Dec 22 2008, 12:44 PM)
if you start with 5-6% in separating gel you do not need a stacking gel; if used it should be lower than <5%;

you need a reference protein >/= 310 kDa;

use 0.037-0.05%SDS

why using sterile milk solution? through it away after usage...


I'm still waiting for the new blotting unit, but then I will try a 6% gel and a buffer with SDS.

Reference protein....hm.... huh.gif I just want to show size differences and the second form of the protein is in the range of my marker and I have a positive control (cell line).

I thought sterile milk solution might be better if there's anything inside the powder (fibres or whatever) that might interfere the blot. But you're right, I will just prepare it fresh, that's the easiest way.

Thanks!

-vista-

QUOTE (vista @ Dec 29 2008, 05:24 AM)
I thought sterile milk solution might be better if there's anything inside the powder (fibres or whatever) that might interfere the blot. But you're right, I will just prepare it fresh, that's the easiest way.

you should still filter (doesn't have to be sterile) to remove particulates when you prepare solution from powder.

-mdfenko-

Pages: 1 2 Next