question on pulldown - (Nov/10/2006 )
hello, guys!
GST pulldown puzzled me almost two months! story is like this:
i want to identify interaction between A and B. GST-A and myc-B are used and collected by prokaryotic and eukaryotic expression respectively.
the process is: 1. GST-A is purified with glutathion sepharose beads successfully
2. the beads with GST-A and GST(negative control) were blocked with 0.1 percent BSA 10 hr
3. Then the beads were incubated with myc-B(myc-B is from eukaryotic cell lysate)
4. the pellet was loaded then ditected by myc Ab
negative control is GST-beads
positive control is myc-B cell lysate
negative control and A-GST-beads were quantitized, then the quantity of GST is more than the quantity of GST-A.
my question is whether the wash buffer can affect the interaction, (my wash buffer is 0.1 percent TritonX-100, 60mM NaCl, 10 percent glycerol, 1mM EDTA, 20mM HEPES)
my sample and negative control show the same quantity on autoradiograph
i will go mad!!
whooooo give me adviceeeee!!
GST pulldown puzzled me almost two months! story is like this:
i want to identify interaction between A and B. GST-A and myc-B are used and collected by prokaryotic and eukaryotic expression respectively.
the process is: 1. GST-A is purified with glutathion sepharose beads successfully
2. the beads with GST-A and GST(negative control) were blocked with 0.1 percent BSA 10 hr
3. Then the beads were incubated with myc-B(myc-B is from eukaryotic cell lysate)
4. the pellet was loaded then ditected by myc Ab
negative control is GST-beads
positive control is myc-B cell lysate
negative control and A-GST-beads were quantitized, then the quantity of GST is more than the quantity of GST-A.
my question is whether the wash buffer can affect the interaction, (my wash buffer is 0.1 percent TritonX-100, 60mM NaCl, 10 percent glycerol, 1mM EDTA, 20mM HEPES)
my sample and negative control show the same quantity on autoradiograph
i will go mad!!
"my sample" is the pelleted pull-down complex of myc-B-A-GST-beads, ok? what is radioactivly labeled?
incubation buffer and washing buffer which should be same or at least similar for the main components and parameters, are indeed critical; the buffer should favor the binding of both proteins; ionic or hydrophobic interactions or a mixture may bind proteins together; so, if there is anything known about which type of binding interaction is realized it should be promoted by the buffers; moreover, unspecific binding to GST-sepharose may happen; I think that is the reason why triton x-100 is added; there may be other reasons for high background and unspecific binding:
low frequency of washing (but I suppose you wash extensively)
or wrong buffer: choose a higher as well as a lower ionic stregth; also, pH can cause trouble, do you know the pI of A and B? try different pH between pH6.5 and pH8.0
hello, guys!
GST pulldown puzzled me almost two months! story is like this:
i want to identify interaction between A and B. GST-A and myc-B are used and collected by prokaryotic and eukaryotic expression respectively.
the process is: 1. GST-A is purified with glutathion sepharose beads successfully
2. the beads with GST-A and GST(negative control) were blocked with 0.1 percent BSA 10 hr
3. Then the beads were incubated with myc-B(myc-B is from eukaryotic cell lysate)
4. the pellet was loaded then ditected by myc Ab
negative control is GST-beads
positive control is myc-B cell lysate
negative control and A-GST-beads were quantitized, then the quantity of GST is more than the quantity of GST-A.
my question is whether the wash buffer can affect the interaction, (my wash buffer is 0.1 percent TritonX-100, 60mM NaCl, 10 percent glycerol, 1mM EDTA, 20mM HEPES)
my sample and negative control show the same quantity on autoradiograph
i will go mad!!
"my sample" is the pelleted pull-down complex of myc-B-A-GST-beads, ok? what is radioactivly labeled?
incubation buffer and washing buffer which should be same or at least similar for the main components and parameters, are indeed critical; the buffer should favor the binding of both proteins; ionic or hydrophobic interactions or a mixture may bind proteins together; so, if there is anything known about which type of binding interaction is realized it should be promoted by the buffers; moreover, unspecific binding to GST-sepharose may happen; I think that is the reason why triton x-100 is added; there may be other reasons for high background and unspecific binding:
low frequency of washing (but I suppose you wash extensively)
or wrong buffer: choose a higher as well as a lower ionic stregth; also, pH can cause trouble, do you know the pI of A and B? try different pH between pH6.5 and pH8.0
None is radioactively labeled, the result is shown by mouse anti-myc antibody and HRP conjugated anti-mouse antibody.
the wash buffer and incubation buffer components are same.
the pI of A do not need being checked, because my labmate do interaction between A and C(another protein), the pH7.2 work ,i think pI of B maybe affect the interaction.
how to adjust the the pH between pH6.5 and pH8.0, depending on pI of B.
thanks to kosmodrom
hello, guys!
GST pulldown puzzled me almost two months! story is like this:
i want to identify interaction between A and B. GST-A and myc-B are used and collected by prokaryotic and eukaryotic expression respectively.
the process is: 1. GST-A is purified with glutathion sepharose beads successfully
2. the beads with GST-A and GST(negative control) were blocked with 0.1 percent BSA 10 hr
3. Then the beads were incubated with myc-B(myc-B is from eukaryotic cell lysate)
4. the pellet was loaded then ditected by myc Ab
negative control is GST-beads
positive control is myc-B cell lysate
negative control and A-GST-beads were quantitized, then the quantity of GST is more than the quantity of GST-A.
my question is whether the wash buffer can affect the interaction, (my wash buffer is 0.1 percent TritonX-100, 60mM NaCl, 10 percent glycerol, 1mM EDTA, 20mM HEPES)
my sample and negative control show the same quantity on autoradiograph
i will go mad!!
"my sample" is the pelleted pull-down complex of myc-B-A-GST-beads, ok? what is radioactivly labeled?
incubation buffer and washing buffer which should be same or at least similar for the main components and parameters, are indeed critical; the buffer should favor the binding of both proteins; ionic or hydrophobic interactions or a mixture may bind proteins together; so, if there is anything known about which type of binding interaction is realized it should be promoted by the buffers; moreover, unspecific binding to GST-sepharose may happen; I think that is the reason why triton x-100 is added; there may be other reasons for high background and unspecific binding:
low frequency of washing (but I suppose you wash extensively)
or wrong buffer: choose a higher as well as a lower ionic stregth; also, pH can cause trouble, do you know the pI of A and B? try different pH between pH6.5 and pH8.0
None is radioactively labeled, the result is shown by mouse anti-myc antibody and HRP conjugated anti-mouse antibody.
the wash buffer and incubation buffer components are same.
the pI of A do not need being checked, because my labmate do interaction between A and C(another protein), the pH7.2 work ,i think pI of B maybe affect the interaction.
how to adjust the the pH between pH6.5 and pH8.0, depending on pI of B.
thanks to kosmodrom
I was puzzled about radioactivity as you wrote about autoradiographs but what you meant are autoluminographs;
working with buffers and pI is theoretically simple: using a buffer below your pI of protein X, it carries a positive net charge, above the pI a negative net charge; if you find out the pI for protein A and B, you may find a pH were they carry opposite charges where you may have a good ionic interaction; so, in this case chaotropes should be diminished
hello, guys!
GST pulldown puzzled me almost two months! story is like this:
i want to identify interaction between A and B. GST-A and myc-B are used and collected by prokaryotic and eukaryotic expression respectively.
the process is: 1. GST-A is purified with glutathion sepharose beads successfully
2. the beads with GST-A and GST(negative control) were blocked with 0.1 percent BSA 10 hr
3. Then the beads were incubated with myc-B(myc-B is from eukaryotic cell lysate)
4. the pellet was loaded then ditected by myc Ab
negative control is GST-beads
positive control is myc-B cell lysate
negative control and A-GST-beads were quantitized, then the quantity of GST is more than the quantity of GST-A.
my question is whether the wash buffer can affect the interaction, (my wash buffer is 0.1 percent TritonX-100, 60mM NaCl, 10 percent glycerol, 1mM EDTA, 20mM HEPES)
my sample and negative control show the same quantity on autoradiograph
i will go mad!!
"my sample" is the pelleted pull-down complex of myc-B-A-GST-beads, ok? what is radioactivly labeled?
incubation buffer and washing buffer which should be same or at least similar for the main components and parameters, are indeed critical; the buffer should favor the binding of both proteins; ionic or hydrophobic interactions or a mixture may bind proteins together; so, if there is anything known about which type of binding interaction is realized it should be promoted by the buffers; moreover, unspecific binding to GST-sepharose may happen; I think that is the reason why triton x-100 is added; there may be other reasons for high background and unspecific binding:
low frequency of washing (but I suppose you wash extensively)
or wrong buffer: choose a higher as well as a lower ionic stregth; also, pH can cause trouble, do you know the pI of A and B? try different pH between pH6.5 and pH8.0
None is radioactively labeled, the result is shown by mouse anti-myc antibody and HRP conjugated anti-mouse antibody.
the wash buffer and incubation buffer components are same.
the pI of A do not need being checked, because my labmate do interaction between A and C(another protein), the pH7.2 work ,i think pI of B maybe affect the interaction.
how to adjust the the pH between pH6.5 and pH8.0, depending on pI of B.
thanks to kosmodrom
I was puzzled about radioactivity as you wrote about autoradiographs but what you meant are autoluminographs;
working with buffers and pI is theoretically simple: using a buffer below your pI of protein X, it carries a positive net charge, above the pI a negative net charge; if you find out the pI for protein A and B, you may find a pH were they carry opposite charges where you may have a good ionic interaction; so, in this case chaotropes should be diminished
first of all, i say sorry to kosmodrom, because of my bad expression ,you are puzzled. my way of getting result is by autoluminograph. pI of A is 8.000 and pI of B is 11.0, so as your method ,i should choose pH between 8 and 11. but my labmate do interaction between C(pI 8.000) and D(pI 9.13), he succeed in the identification of interaction at pH 7.4. why? thanks to kosmodrom
hello, guys!
GST pulldown puzzled me almost two months! story is like this:
i want to identify interaction between A and B. GST-A and myc-B are used and collected by prokaryotic and eukaryotic expression respectively.
the process is: 1. GST-A is purified with glutathion sepharose beads successfully
2. the beads with GST-A and GST(negative control) were blocked with 0.1 percent BSA 10 hr
3. Then the beads were incubated with myc-B(myc-B is from eukaryotic cell lysate)
4. the pellet was loaded then ditected by myc Ab
negative control is GST-beads
positive control is myc-B cell lysate
negative control and A-GST-beads were quantitized, then the quantity of GST is more than the quantity of GST-A.
my question is whether the wash buffer can affect the interaction, (my wash buffer is 0.1 percent TritonX-100, 60mM NaCl, 10 percent glycerol, 1mM EDTA, 20mM HEPES)
my sample and negative control show the same quantity on autoradiograph
i will go mad!!
"my sample" is the pelleted pull-down complex of myc-B-A-GST-beads, ok? what is radioactivly labeled?
incubation buffer and washing buffer which should be same or at least similar for the main components and parameters, are indeed critical; the buffer should favor the binding of both proteins; ionic or hydrophobic interactions or a mixture may bind proteins together; so, if there is anything known about which type of binding interaction is realized it should be promoted by the buffers; moreover, unspecific binding to GST-sepharose may happen; I think that is the reason why triton x-100 is added; there may be other reasons for high background and unspecific binding:
low frequency of washing (but I suppose you wash extensively)
or wrong buffer: choose a higher as well as a lower ionic stregth; also, pH can cause trouble, do you know the pI of A and B? try different pH between pH6.5 and pH8.0
None is radioactively labeled, the result is shown by mouse anti-myc antibody and HRP conjugated anti-mouse antibody.
the wash buffer and incubation buffer components are same.
the pI of A do not need being checked, because my labmate do interaction between A and C(another protein), the pH7.2 work ,i think pI of B maybe affect the interaction.
how to adjust the the pH between pH6.5 and pH8.0, depending on pI of B.
thanks to kosmodrom
I was puzzled about radioactivity as you wrote about autoradiographs but what you meant are autoluminographs;
working with buffers and pI is theoretically simple: using a buffer below your pI of protein X, it carries a positive net charge, above the pI a negative net charge; if you find out the pI for protein A and B, you may find a pH were they carry opposite charges where you may have a good ionic interaction; so, in this case chaotropes should be diminished
first of all, i say sorry to kosmodrom, because of my bad expression ,you are puzzled. my way of getting result is by autoluminograph. pI of A is 8.000 and pI of B is 11.0, so as your method ,i should choose pH between 8 and 11. but my labmate do interaction between C(pI 8.000) and D(pI 9.13), he succeed in the identification of interaction at pH 7.4. why? thanks to kosmodrom
it´s a question of optimization in trial and error; beside interaction by charge, hydrophobic interaction is possible or as I said before a mixture of charge and hydrophobic interaction; you may not circumvent to find out the right conditions by some more experiments;
moreover, harsh pH may damage or denature your proteins, so one has to be careful