Protocol Online logo
Top : Forum Archives: : Molecular Cloning

minimal promoter - (Jan/19/2006 )

hi guys,

i have inserted a putative promter of a gene (including UTR, exon1, intron1) into luciferase reporter vector. However it turn out that, the signal generated is way LOWER than the vector without insert (ie. 10 fold+). could it be the product of exon1 of my gene fused/interrupt the luciferase protein ??

secondly, is most of the minimal promoter present ard 150bp upstream of transciption start site? IF not, how do u guys normally search for it ??

thx huh.gif

-cyk-

am I understanding this correctly? your insert only goes to -150? I would use a larger piece

you may have encountered a portion of the promoter used for negative regulation; if you took a larger piece of the promoter and saw good expression I would wonder if perhaps there is a repressor motif of some sort in the -150 region

is your gene prokaryotic? eukaryotic? archaeaic?

-aimikins-

I'd go with your first thought. Having an exon and an intron there is likely to disrupt the luciferase protein (sructure, processing, frame shift -all are possible)

I don't think that the concept of 'minimal promoter' can be applied generically. I agree with aimikins that you should extend your fragment 5' (can't say how far) and see what you get.

-neuromatt-

my insert is 2.4kb long including 400+ bp of exon1 and intron1 at its 3' end.... It's mouse gene. I included the exon and intron because i suspected it contain some regulatory element on it...

sigh. think now i shld elongate more to 5' end and get rid of the exon and intron fragment....

any more suggestion before i proceed... sad~~

cyk

-cyk-

So your insert is mainly promoter. I don't think to need to extend the sequence 5' as it's fairly large. I still think that the intron and exon might be a problem, especially as the signal is lower than the promoter-less control. I feel that it is unlikely to be due to a genuine repressor element and is more likely to be due to some sort of disruption.

Do you have a +ve control e.g. viral driven? How does that look?

I do a lot of promoter work but it is restricted to only a few genes, so I'm not so good on the general stuff. Hopefully some else will have some input

-neuromatt-