What is this? - (May/14/2009 )
Or sparrows looking at the scale bar....
-LostintheLab-
you guys.....I'm trying to have a serious discussion about prehistoric art here (altho my time scales are off)...BB needs closure on this...... stone age men are preoccupied with two things- sex and food (even while eating, he needs to be reminded of sex or vice versa)....so we can logically assume that this figurine serves both purposes...a sensual, goddess venus (for the sex part) and my first guess- a giant and severely deformed molar (for the eating part)......
...and this even gets better...how about the "artists" being medically inclined and they're actually, our prototype ob-gynecologists and dentists...so instead of books or atlases, they carved these teaching/medical tools...we shouldn't rule out this possibility...(actually, the ob-gyn connection was already postulated before but not the dental one- that's originally mine.... 
)....
-casandra-
casandra on May 18 2009, 02:52 PM said:
you guys.....I'm trying to have a serious discussion about prehistoric art here (altho my time scales are off)...BB needs closure on this...... stone age men are preoccupied with two things- sex and food (even while eating, he needs to be reminded of sex or vice versa)....so we can logically assume that this figurine serves both purposes...a sensual, goddess venus (for the sex part) and my first guess- a giant and severely deformed molar (for the eating part).........and this even gets better...how about the "artists" being medically inclined and they're actually, our prototype ob-gynecologists and dentists...so instead of books or atlases, they carved these teaching/medical tools...we shouldn't rule out this possibility...(actually, the ob-gyn connection was already postulated before but not the dental one- that's originally mine....
)....Noble savages are a rumour, they were as we're today, we're their progeny, don't forget. Food and reproduction that's what counted. Therefore it's pure sex-symbols and all parts of importance are shown more than clear.
A 30,000 years old porn.
-hobglobin-
hobglobin on May 18 2009, 03:17 PM said:
casandra on May 18 2009, 02:52 PM said:
you guys.....I'm trying to have a serious discussion about prehistoric art here (altho my time scales are off)...BB needs closure on this...... stone age men are preoccupied with two things- sex and food (even while eating, he needs to be reminded of sex or vice versa)....so we can logically assume that this figurine serves both purposes...a sensual, goddess venus (for the sex part) and my first guess- a giant and severely deformed molar (for the eating part).........and this even gets better...how about the "artists" being medically inclined and they're actually, our prototype ob-gynecologists and dentists...so instead of books or atlases, they carved these teaching/medical tools...we shouldn't rule out this possibility...(actually, the ob-gyn connection was already postulated before but not the dental one- that's originally mine....
)....Noble savages are a rumour, they were as we're today, we're their progeny, don't forget. Food and reproduction that's what counted. Therefore it's pure sex-symbols and all parts of importance are shown more than clear.
A 30,000 years old porn.
and you've got the same 19th century thinking......how about this....that they are made by women for women....it's partly called- the self-inspection theory..., measurement scales were off, perspective was strange...probably because it's the sculptress viewing her own body (from the top of course..)...no wonder it's all breasts and tummy... 
... -casandra-
casandra on May 18 2009, 09:33 PM said:
hobglobin on May 18 2009, 03:17 PM said:
casandra on May 18 2009, 02:52 PM said:
you guys.....I'm trying to have a serious discussion about prehistoric art here (altho my time scales are off)...BB needs closure on this...... stone age men are preoccupied with two things- sex and food (even while eating, he needs to be reminded of sex or vice versa)....so we can logically assume that this figurine serves both purposes...a sensual, goddess venus (for the sex part) and my first guess- a giant and severely deformed molar (for the eating part).........and this even gets better...how about the "artists" being medically inclined and they're actually, our prototype ob-gynecologists and dentists...so instead of books or atlases, they carved these teaching/medical tools...we shouldn't rule out this possibility...(actually, the ob-gyn connection was already postulated before but not the dental one- that's originally mine....
)....Noble savages are a rumour, they were as we're today, we're their progeny, don't forget. Food and reproduction that's what counted. Therefore it's pure sex-symbols and all parts of importance are shown more than clear.
A 30,000 years old porn.
and you've got the same 19th century thinking......how about this....that they are made by women for women....it's partly called- the self-inspection theory..., measurement scales were off, perspective was strange...probably because it's the sculptress viewing her own body (from the top of course..)...no wonder it's all breasts and tummy... ...It has the same chance to be true as if they are claimed to be neolithic advertisements for (wonder-)bras.
-hobglobin-
hobglobin on May 18 2009, 03:50 PM said:
casandra on May 18 2009, 09:33 PM said:
hobglobin on May 18 2009, 03:17 PM said:
casandra on May 18 2009, 02:52 PM said:
you guys.....I'm trying to have a serious discussion about prehistoric art here (altho my time scales are off)...BB needs closure on this...... stone age men are preoccupied with two things- sex and food (even while eating, he needs to be reminded of sex or vice versa)....so we can logically assume that this figurine serves both purposes...a sensual, goddess venus (for the sex part) and my first guess- a giant and severely deformed molar (for the eating part).........and this even gets better...how about the "artists" being medically inclined and they're actually, our prototype ob-gynecologists and dentists...so instead of books or atlases, they carved these teaching/medical tools...we shouldn't rule out this possibility...(actually, the ob-gyn connection was already postulated before but not the dental one- that's originally mine....
)....Noble savages are a rumour, they were as we're today, we're their progeny, don't forget. Food and reproduction that's what counted. Therefore it's pure sex-symbols and all parts of importance are shown more than clear.
A 30,000 years old porn.
and you've got the same 19th century thinking......how about this....that they are made by women for women....it's partly called- the self-inspection theory..., measurement scales were off, perspective was strange...probably because it's the sculptress viewing her own body (from the top of course..)...no wonder it's all breasts and tummy... ...It has the same chance to be true as if they are claimed to be neolithic advertisements for (wonder-)bras.
why not? there are a thousand ways of skinning a cat....just to enliven the usual boring 'it's nothing but stone age caveman sex toy'...
-casandra-
casandra on May 18 2009, 10:01 PM said:
hobglobin on May 18 2009, 03:50 PM said:
casandra on May 18 2009, 09:33 PM said:
hobglobin on May 18 2009, 03:17 PM said:
casandra on May 18 2009, 02:52 PM said:
you guys.....I'm trying to have a serious discussion about prehistoric art here (altho my time scales are off)...BB needs closure on this...... stone age men are preoccupied with two things- sex and food (even while eating, he needs to be reminded of sex or vice versa)....so we can logically assume that this figurine serves both purposes...a sensual, goddess venus (for the sex part) and my first guess- a giant and severely deformed molar (for the eating part).........and this even gets better...how about the "artists" being medically inclined and they're actually, our prototype ob-gynecologists and dentists...so instead of books or atlases, they carved these teaching/medical tools...we shouldn't rule out this possibility...(actually, the ob-gyn connection was already postulated before but not the dental one- that's originally mine....
)....Noble savages are a rumour, they were as we're today, we're their progeny, don't forget. Food and reproduction that's what counted. Therefore it's pure sex-symbols and all parts of importance are shown more than clear.
A 30,000 years old porn.
and you've got the same 19th century thinking......how about this....that they are made by women for women....it's partly called- the self-inspection theory..., measurement scales were off, perspective was strange...probably because it's the sculptress viewing her own body (from the top of course..)...no wonder it's all breasts and tummy... ...It has the same chance to be true as if they are claimed to be neolithic advertisements for (wonder-)bras.
why not? there are a thousand ways of skinning a cat....just to enliven the usual boring 'it's nothing but stone age caveman sex toy'...
Think of Occam's razor...
These are Minoic goddess sculptures, only some thousands years old but somehow the same "habitus"...
-hobglobin-
hobglobin on May 18 2009, 04:20 PM said:
casandra on May 18 2009, 10:01 PM said:
hobglobin on May 18 2009, 03:50 PM said:
casandra on May 18 2009, 09:33 PM said:
hobglobin on May 18 2009, 03:17 PM said:
casandra on May 18 2009, 02:52 PM said:
you guys.....I'm trying to have a serious discussion about prehistoric art here (altho my time scales are off)...BB needs closure on this...... stone age men are preoccupied with two things- sex and food (even while eating, he needs to be reminded of sex or vice versa)....so we can logically assume that this figurine serves both purposes...a sensual, goddess venus (for the sex part) and my first guess- a giant and severely deformed molar (for the eating part).........and this even gets better...how about the "artists" being medically inclined and they're actually, our prototype ob-gynecologists and dentists...so instead of books or atlases, they carved these teaching/medical tools...we shouldn't rule out this possibility...(actually, the ob-gyn connection was already postulated before but not the dental one- that's originally mine....
)....Noble savages are a rumour, they were as we're today, we're their progeny, don't forget. Food and reproduction that's what counted. Therefore it's pure sex-symbols and all parts of importance are shown more than clear.
A 30,000 years old porn.
and you've got the same 19th century thinking......how about this....that they are made by women for women....it's partly called- the self-inspection theory..., measurement scales were off, perspective was strange...probably because it's the sculptress viewing her own body (from the top of course..)...no wonder it's all breasts and tummy... ...It has the same chance to be true as if they are claimed to be neolithic advertisements for (wonder-)bras.
why not? there are a thousand ways of skinning a cat....just to enliven the usual boring 'it's nothing but stone age caveman sex toy'...
Think of Occam's razor...
These are Minoic goddess sculptures, only some thousands years old but somehow the same "habitus"...
a one-track mind.............really and totally shaved....why couldn't any of the goddesses (doesn't really matter from which epoch) just represent feminine power and uterus envy?
-casandra-