Western blot or western blot? - (Mar/07/2007 )
Hi all,
A rather odd question but I'm writing my PhD thesis and I'd like to know whether you spell Western blot with a capital 'W' or a small case 'w' when it's in the middle of a sentence? I've seen it spelt both with 'W' and 'w' so is it just preference?
Thanks
Sxxx
A rather odd question but I'm writing my PhD thesis and I'd like to know whether you spell Western blot with a capital 'W' or a small case 'w' when it's in the middle of a sentence? I've seen it spelt both with 'W' and 'w' so is it just preference?
Thanks
Sxxx
I would use 'w' if its in the middle of a sentence. Check with your PI.
A rather odd question but I'm writing my PhD thesis and I'd like to know whether you spell Western blot with a capital 'W' or a small case 'w' when it's in the middle of a sentence? I've seen it spelt both with 'W' and 'w' so is it just preference?
Thanks
Sxxx
I think it derives from a pun with Edwin Southern´s name, who invented the Southern blot; so Western blot isn´t a proper name but adapted to a proper name (Southern) and therefore should be written with capital "W"; the same counts for Northern blot; "western" written with small letter suggests an adjective without making any sense
I second Bearer. In the literature, you will see most people use capital "W" for Western blot.
Cheers guys,
Yeah my gut feeling was 'Western' so I'll probably use that in the end!
Sxxx
I disagree strongly -- the opposite logic applies. "Southern blot" is capitalized only because "Southern" is a proper name; all other blotting methods do not cite proper names, and thus are not capitailized. Puns do not negate grammar...
agree with pcrman and the Bearer, regardless of names..it would more clear if you captilize the letter..anyone will recognize the term mentioned as "the blot"..not anything else
I think it is a case of doubt: concerning orthography (not grammar) you may find criteria for the one or the other notation; so one has to justify what is "western" (as a geographical direction) of a Western blot, or if it is a tribute to an imaginery Mr or Ms Western;
by the way, does anyone know if there are the surnames "Western" or "Northern" existing in reality?
So, because we have Gram stain and Coomassie stain, all stains must be capitalized? There is no issue here -- the correct way to do it is clear and unambiguous.
You sound like a prof
Don't the previous posts contradict that the correct way is clear and ubnambiguous?
And why don't you give a clear and unambiguous answer then, since you are perfectly right?
As in:
Southern blot is capitalized because it was named after Edward Southern - northern and western blot are not capitalized, as these terms were only introduced as
plays on the Southern blot. The same goes for stains - "Gram stain" and "Coomassie stain" are capitalized as they are named after the people that developed them, as opposed to a "crystal violet stain".