Protocol Online logo
Top : Forum Archives: : Immunology and Histology

Nuclear staining instead of cytoskeleton - (Aug/12/2006 )

Pages: 1 2 Next

Hi there,

I just did some immunochemistry with an antibody against a protein that is known for binding to the cytoskeleton and does not have a NLS. However, my results show big lumps in the nucleus giving a very strong signal and a much weaker signal from the cytoskeleton. blink.gif

Does anyone have any idea of what might be wrong here?

Thanks,

-Edwige-

QUOTE (Edwige @ Aug 12 2006, 11:22 AM)
Hi there,

I just did some immunochemistry with an antibody against a protein that is known for binding to the cytoskeleton and does not have a NLS. However, my results show big lumps in the nucleus giving a very strong signal and a much weaker signal from the cytoskeleton. blink.gif

Does anyone have any idea of what might be wrong here?

Thanks,


What is NLS?

Did u have a positive control for the antibody? How does it look like ?

-scolix-

how did you fix the cells?

-genehunter-1-

Hi scolix,

NLS stands for "Nuclear Localization sequence". I do not expect to find this protein in the nucleus if it does not carry a NLS.
What would you call a positive control? The cells I did an immuno staining with are supposed to contain a lot of this protein already.

-Edwige-

QUOTE (genehunter-1 @ Aug 12 2006, 10:47 PM)
how did you fix the cells?


Hi gene-hunter-1,

I fixed them with PFA 4% and permeabilized them with triton 0.1%.

-Edwige-

I dont know if a western blot using cytosol and nuclei fractions will help
probe what may go wrong. Any chance that this is not the antibody you expected to be?

-genehunter-1-

With positive control, I meant if u had tried staining cells before which gives the right pattern of staining.
But since u wrote that these cells contain lot of this protien, i would assume it to b.

I would agree with genehunter on trying out western but subcellular fractionation is not very clean but u could get some idea abt the presence of the protein in the nucleus or cytosolic fractions.

Verify the antibody and the pattern of staining from some papers.

-scolix-

How does your DIC look?? Do the cells maintain theri integrity???

I think you might want to try your fixing with PF and cold methanol. Sometimes trition can polymerize actin/tubulin filaments. So what you might be actually seeing as lumps in ur nucleus might be clumps of cytosolic or cell membrane fragments.

-Casper-

QUOTE (genehunter-1 @ Aug 12 2006, 11:19 PM)
I dont know if a western blot using cytosol and nuclei fractions will help
probe what may go wrong. Any chance that this is not the antibody you expected to be?


I might try a western blot...
I got the antibody from another lab but I trust it to be ok though its concentration is very low (double purification) and I dilute it by 1/20.

-Edwige-

QUOTE (scolix @ Aug 13 2006, 12:48 AM)
With positive control, I meant if u had tried staining cells before which gives the right pattern of staining.
But since u wrote that these cells contain lot of this protien, i would assume it to b.

I would agree with genehunter on trying out western but subcellular fractionation is not very clean but u could get some idea abt the presence of the protein in the nucleus or cytosolic fractions.

Verify the antibody and the pattern of staining from some papers.


Hi,
I will contact the lab that sent me this antibody to find out more about the pattern of staining

Thanks

-Edwige-

Pages: 1 2 Next