Nuclear staining instead of cytoskeleton - (Aug/12/2006 )
Hi there,
I just did some immunochemistry with an antibody against a protein that is known for binding to the cytoskeleton and does not have a NLS. However, my results show big lumps in the nucleus giving a very strong signal and a much weaker signal from the cytoskeleton.
Does anyone have any idea of what might be wrong here?
Thanks,
I just did some immunochemistry with an antibody against a protein that is known for binding to the cytoskeleton and does not have a NLS. However, my results show big lumps in the nucleus giving a very strong signal and a much weaker signal from the cytoskeleton.

Does anyone have any idea of what might be wrong here?
Thanks,
What is NLS?
Did u have a positive control for the antibody? How does it look like ?
how did you fix the cells?
Hi scolix,
NLS stands for "Nuclear Localization sequence". I do not expect to find this protein in the nucleus if it does not carry a NLS.
What would you call a positive control? The cells I did an immuno staining with are supposed to contain a lot of this protein already.
Hi gene-hunter-1,
I fixed them with PFA 4% and permeabilized them with triton 0.1%.
I dont know if a western blot using cytosol and nuclei fractions will help
probe what may go wrong. Any chance that this is not the antibody you expected to be?
With positive control, I meant if u had tried staining cells before which gives the right pattern of staining.
But since u wrote that these cells contain lot of this protien, i would assume it to b.
I would agree with genehunter on trying out western but subcellular fractionation is not very clean but u could get some idea abt the presence of the protein in the nucleus or cytosolic fractions.
Verify the antibody and the pattern of staining from some papers.
How does your DIC look?? Do the cells maintain theri integrity???
I think you might want to try your fixing with PF and cold methanol. Sometimes trition can polymerize actin/tubulin filaments. So what you might be actually seeing as lumps in ur nucleus might be clumps of cytosolic or cell membrane fragments.
probe what may go wrong. Any chance that this is not the antibody you expected to be?
I might try a western blot...
I got the antibody from another lab but I trust it to be ok though its concentration is very low (double purification) and I dilute it by 1/20.
But since u wrote that these cells contain lot of this protien, i would assume it to b.
I would agree with genehunter on trying out western but subcellular fractionation is not very clean but u could get some idea abt the presence of the protein in the nucleus or cytosolic fractions.
Verify the antibody and the pattern of staining from some papers.
Hi,
I will contact the lab that sent me this antibody to find out more about the pattern of staining
Thanks