Am I using the right t-test for each comparison? - (Jun/12/2012 )
Briefly, I have 2 groups: healthy control & patients (n=9 in each group). Blood collected from each of this group before and after certain treatment. Then I went on to compare RNA expression, cell counts, etc between these groups, as well as before-after comparison. Controls are sex-matched.
This is how I analysed the results:
qPCR
1) Gene expression, normalised to housekeeping gene, before & after treatment (in each individual group) ---> Wilcoxon paired t-test (because data not normally distributed)
2) qPCR gene expression results were transformed into log2 ratio (after treatment/steady state) --> for this I used Mann-Whitney U test to compare ratios control vs. patients.
Cell counts
3) cell counts comparing steady state (pre-treatment) in controls vs. patients
4) " " " post-treatment " " " "
----> for these two cell counts analysis (3 & 4) I used normal unpaired t-test (therefore, comparing the means).
5) cell counts comparing before & after treatment in each group (e.g. patients before vs. patients after)
----> this one I used normal paired t-test. However I'm not sure if I should use Wilcoxon instead. Is it possible for one group is normally distributed, while the other is not? If this is true, which test should I use?
Your sample numbers are too low to be using parametric tests like student's t-test, you should probably always be using non-parametric tests such as the wilcoxon.
OK, the main reason would be small sample number, therefore I should opt for non-parametric test in all the situations above. Thanks!